parrotpatriot is back!!

  • Advertisements


Posted by parrotpatriot on July 20, 2009

To the girl who argued with me about forced abortions: See what I mean?!? Seriously, how big of a jump is it to go from “cutting healthcare costs” to eliminating humans to care for? And by all means, get rid of the most undesirable humans first, right? Which ones are those you ask? I guess whomever the elite decide it is. Hitler thought it was the Jews. Here in Socialist America, it looks like the first stop in the determination will be the Comparative Effectiveness Research Commission.

chart_lg with arrow

Cost-benefit analysis, a management tool normally reserved for anticipating the potential cost vs. benefit of a proposed business transaction, will be applied to yours and your family members’ lives. The costs of providing certain healthcare will be weighed against the benefits that can be derived from providing that care. The love you feel for your 90-year-old grandmother will not be figured into that equation. The love your 90-year-old grandmother feels for life will not be figured into that equation. Those inputs are not associated with a cost and are therefore excluded from the formula. The bond you and your grandmother share has no value to society – it is not a benefit to society. Your grandmother is simply not worth it as she does nothing to contribute to the GDP. You will have to let her go – the surgery she needs to save her life will not be provided. You will have to sacrifice. Don’t you want to give your fair share?

John Holdren is BO’s Science Czar who co-authored a book in 1977 called Ecoscience, which proposes sick stuff intended to control over-population.

I was shocked the first time I read about Eugenics, defined as follows by Wikipedia:

…the study of, or belief in, the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits (negative eugenics) or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics)…

While the rest of the world decided Eugenics was cold and unethical by the 40’s, this Holdren guy is still espousing this sick stuff in the late 70’s in his book. And BO has made him a Czar. Science Czar. This is surreal.

eugenics article

Interesting how this all fits together with the global warming scare:

Social progressives concluded that were this situation allowed to continue unchecked, within a few generations the whole earth would be overrun by undesirables. Consequently, the scientific community, led by August Weismann, produced studies and scientific papers that justified a range of laws governing mixed-race marriage, and even government-mandated sterilization of “degenerates..

When it was introduced, the global warming theory sounded reasonable: since carbon dioxide was known to be increasing in the atmosphere, the “thickened” atmosphere would trap the sun’s heat and cause global warming. (Of course, initially, in the 1970s, it was thought that the result of increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would be global cooling, and the onset of a new ice age).

Had computers been available to the eugenicists, no doubt they would have produced computer models to predict how long it would take for mixed-race marriages, and cross-breeding degenerates to destroy the world, as they knew it. They did the best they could without computers, and were successful in forcing more than 60,000 sterilizations in the United States, and the slaughter of six million jews in Germany.

Scientists who dare to question the global warming “consensus,” are ridiculed, and branded as contrarians, as were the skeptics of eugenics. Government and foundations withhold grants from researchers whose work product fails to advance the global warming consensus, in much the same way skeptics of eugenics were denied research grants. Universities and education associations teach the global warming theory as fact, just as they taught the theory of eugenics as fact. Even churches are pressured to take up the global warming cause–just as they were pressured to preach eugenics. Politicians who fail to toe the global-warming line are targeted for replacement–as were the politicians who opposed segregation and forced sterilization.

Social progressives who are advancing the global warming theory would do well to consider the similarity of their campaign to the rise and fall of the eugenics campaign.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: